In the complex landscape of modern ministry, no single individual, network, or organization can effectively reach the nations alone. The magnitude of the task demands something more dynamic than traditional team structures—it requires what we might call “teaming.” This approach transcends conventional organizational boundaries and rigid hierarchies, focusing instead on building fluid, purposeful partnerships that can adapt and respond to the ever-changing needs of the mission field.
At its core, teaming answers one fundamental question: “Who can we count on?” This seemingly simple query opens the door to a revolutionary way of thinking about partnership in ministry. Unlike traditional teams, which often operate within clear organizational boundaries and fixed structures, teaming embraces a more flexible and inclusive approach to collaboration. It recognizes that God’s work in our cities and among the nations requires a tapestry of relationships, each serving different but essential functions in advancing the Kingdom.
The concept of teaming emerged from the recognition that the complexity of reaching unreached peoples and places demands more than what any single team or organization can provide. Whether we’re working in urban centers with hundreds of language groups, engaging with refugee communities, or reaching into previously untouched segments of society, the challenges we face require diverse gifts, multiple approaches, and varied resources. Teaming provides the framework for bringing these elements together in a way that maintains focus while maximizing impact.
As we begin to explore the depths of effective teaming, we’ll discover that it’s not just about who we work with—it’s about how we work together. It’s about creating spaces where trust can flourish, where failures become learning opportunities, and where the collective impact far exceeds what any individual or organization could achieve alone. This is the art of teaming—a dynamic approach to partnership that could fundamentally reshape how we engage in Kingdom work.
Understanding Teaming vs Traditional Teams
The distinction between teaming and traditional team structures represents a fundamental shift in how we approach Kingdom work. While traditional teams often operate within rigid organizational boundaries and hierarchical structures, teaming embraces a more fluid and adaptable approach that better serves the complex nature of mission work.
Key Differences
Organizational Structure
Traditional teams typically function within clear organizational boundaries. Members usually belong to the same organization, follow the same protocols, and operate under unified leadership structures. In contrast, teaming transcends organizational boundaries, allowing for partnerships that span across churches, organizations, and even informal networks. This flexibility enables collaboration without requiring formal organizational alignment.
Commitment Levels
While traditional teams often demand full-time, long-term commitments from their members, teaming recognizes the value of varied levels of involvement. Some partnerships might be temporary, focused on specific projects or seasons. Others might be ongoing but part-time. This flexibility allows for maximum participation from individuals and groups who might otherwise be unable to engage in the work.
Focus and Scope
Traditional teams often require members to align on all aspects of the work—methodology, tools, timing, and approach. Teaming, however, allows for focused alignment on specific aspects while maintaining freedom in others. Partners might share a common target group but use different methodologies, or they might share tools but work in different geographic areas.
Benefits of the Teaming Approach
Adaptability to Different Contexts
Teaming’s flexible structure makes it particularly effective in complex ministry contexts. When working across multiple language groups, cultural boundaries, or geographic areas, the ability to form and reform partnerships as needed becomes crucial. This adaptability allows for quick responses to changing circumstances and emerging opportunities.
Cross-Boundary Collaboration
One of the most significant advantages of teaming is its ability to facilitate collaboration across traditional boundaries. This might include:
- Partnerships between different denominations
- Collaboration between formal organizations and informal networks
- Integration of specialists and generalists
- Cooperation between local and global workers
Enhanced Kingdom Impact
By focusing on the mission rather than organizational structures, teaming often leads to greater Kingdom impact. This approach:
- Reduces duplication of efforts
- Maximizes resource utilization
- Leverages diverse gifts and abilities
- Facilitates broader reach and deeper penetration into target communities
Sustainable Growth
The teaming approach promotes sustainable growth by:
- Distributing the workload across multiple partners
- Reducing dependency on any single organization or individual
- Allowing for natural evolution of partnerships
- Creating multiple points of entry for new workers and partners
Practical Implementation
For this approach to work effectively, several key elements must be in place:
- Clear Communication: Partners need to understand their roles, responsibilities, and the scope of their involvement.
- Defined Parameters: While flexible, each teaming relationship should have clear parameters about what is shared and what remains independent.
- Regular Evaluation: Partnerships should be regularly evaluated to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and advance the Kingdom work effectively.
- Trust Building: Intentional effort must be made to build and maintain trust among partners, especially when working across organizational or cultural boundaries.
Understanding these distinctions and benefits helps lay the groundwork for effective teaming. As we move forward, we’ll explore how these principles play out in practical ministry contexts and examine specific structures that can help facilitate successful teaming relationships.
The Concentric Circles Model of Teaming

The concentric circles model provides a practical framework for understanding how different levels of partnership function in ministry contexts.
Moving from the center outward, each circle represents a different level of engagement and commitment, allowing for strategic organization of relationships and resources.
Core Circle: The Apostolic Team
At the heart of the model lies the apostolic team—the smallest but most focused circle. This core group shares:
- Unified target focus
- Common tools and methodologies
- Shared training approaches
- Collective tracking and evaluation processes
The apostolic team typically consists of a small number of deeply committed individuals who work in close alignment. Like Paul and Barnabas being sent from Antioch, these teams operate as extensions of local churches while maintaining focused mission engagement.
Church Circle
The second circle encompasses the local church context, where apostolic teams find their roots and ongoing support. This circle is characterized by:
- Multiple apostolic teams potentially operating from the same church
- Support structures for field workers
- Accountability relationships
- Resource mobilization
- Vision casting and recruitment
While not everyone in the church circle will be directly involved in the target work, they play crucial roles in supporting and enabling the mission.
Discipleship Circle
Moving outward, the discipleship circle includes partners who may not be part of the core team or even the same local church but who can be counted on for discipling new believers. This circle features:
- Cross-organizational collaboration in discipleship
- Shared commitment to spiritual formation
- Flexibility in methodologies while maintaining biblical faithfulness
- Focus on reproducibility and multiplication
Evangelism Circle
The evangelism circle encompasses those who can be counted on for gospel proclamation, even if they approach other aspects of ministry differently. Key characteristics include:
- Shared passion for gospel proclamation
- Diverse methodological approaches
- Focus on specific segments or demographics
- Complementary gifting and abilities
Entry Circle
This broader circle includes those providing access and opportunities for engagement with target communities. Notable elements include:
- Organizations meeting felt needs (like Catholic Charities with refugees)
- Community service providers
- Educational institutions
- Business relationships
- Cultural centers and community groups
These relationships might be informal or even one-way, with partners unaware they’re part of the broader strategy. However, they provide crucial access points for gospel advancement.
Outer Circle: Prayer, Research, and Resources
The outermost circle represents the broadest base of support, encompassing:
- Prayer partners and prayer networks
- Research contributors and analysts
- Resource providers and supporters
- Advocates and mobilizers
This circle requires the least direct alignment in methodology or approach but provides essential support for the overall mission.
Creating Synergy Through Overlap
One of the most powerful aspects of this model is how circles can overlap and interact:
- Individual partners may function in multiple circles
- Resources and relationships can be shared across circles
- Information and learning can flow between different levels
- Multiple teams can benefit from shared outer circle resources
For example, someone sharing the gospel with Jordanian Arabs might also effectively reach Palestinian and Iraqi Arabs, creating natural overlap and efficiency in ministry efforts.
Strategic Implementation
To effectively implement this model:
1. Start from the Center
- Begin by establishing clear core team alignment
- Build strong church DNA and pathway
- Gradually expand outward as relationships develop
2. Maintain Appropriate Expectations
- Different circles require different levels of alignment
- Not every partnership needs to be comprehensive
- Allow for natural development of relationships
3. Foster Movement Between Circles
- Create pathways for partners to move toward greater involvement
- Provide training and development opportunities
- Maintain open communication about opportunities for deeper engagement
4. Regular Evaluation
- Assess effectiveness of partnerships at each level
- Monitor health of relationships
- Adjust strategy based on changing needs and opportunities
The concentric circles model provides both a visual framework and practical guide for organizing and developing ministry partnerships. By understanding where different relationships fit within this model, strategy coordinators can better steward relationships and resources while maintaining focus on their core mission.
Principles for Effective Teaming
The success of any teaming effort hinges on the application of key principles that foster healthy relationships and sustainable partnerships. These principles provide the foundation for building effective ministry collaborations while navigating the complexities of cross-cultural and cross-organizational work.
Trust and Relationships
Building Genuine Connections
Trust forms the bedrock of effective teaming, but it cannot be manufactured or forced. Essential elements include:
- Intentional investment in relationship building
- Consistent follow-through on commitments
- Transparency in communication and decision-making
- Mutual respect for different perspectives and approaches
Creating Safe Spaces
For apostolic teams to thrive, members need environments where they can:
- Take appropriate risks without fear of rejection
- Share failures and learn from them collectively
- Express concerns or disagreements constructively
- Receive and give honest feedback
- Process challenges and setbacks together
Maintaining Healthy Boundaries
Strong relationships require clear boundaries, including:
- Respect for distinctives
- Clear role definitions and expectations
- Protected time for rest and renewal
- Appropriate sharing of resources and responsibilities
Clear Communication
Developing Common Language
Effective teaming requires shared understanding through:
- Agreed-upon terminology for key concepts
- Clear definitions of success metrics
- Shared vocabulary for ministry processes
- Consistent use of tools and frameworks
Setting Clear Expectations
Partners need explicit understanding of:
- Individual and collective responsibilities
- Time commitments and deadlines
- Resource allocation and sharing
- Decision-making processes
- Conflict resolution procedures
Managing Differences
Healthy teams acknowledge and navigate differences by:
- Recognizing varying organizational cultures
- Respecting different leadership styles
- Accommodating diverse ministry approaches
- Finding common ground while maintaining distinctives
Flexibility and Adaptability
Seasonal Partnerships
Not all partnerships need to be permanent. Effective teaming includes:
- Short-term collaborative projects
- Time-bound initiatives
- Seasonal intensives
- Periodic joint efforts
Project-Based Collaboration
Some partnerships form around specific projects requiring:
- Clear start and end dates
- Defined objectives and outcomes
- Specific resource commitments
- Focused evaluation metrics
Adjusting to Change
Successful teaming requires ability to:
- Respond to shifting circumstances
- Modify approaches based on results
- Adapt to new opportunities
- Scale efforts up or down as needed
Practical Implementation Guidelines
1. Regular Assessment
- Schedule periodic relationship check-ins
- Evaluate partnership effectiveness
- Review and adjust expectations
- Celebrate successes and learn from failures
2. Leadership Development
- Invest in emerging leaders
- Share leadership responsibilities
- Create pathways for growth
- Build capacity for future expansion
3. Resource Stewardship
- Share resources wisely
- Avoid unnecessary duplication
- Leverage collective strengths
- Maximize kingdom impact
4. Conflict Prevention and Resolution
- Address issues early
- Maintain open communication channels
- Follow agreed-upon processes
- Seek win-win solutions
The Three Components of Teaming Success
When Kyle first began coordinating strategy in Dallas-Fort Worth, he quickly discovered that effective teaming isn’t just about having the right people—it’s about orchestrating three distinct types of activities that work together like instruments in a symphony.
These three components—Critical Events, Ongoing Processes, and Key Projects—each play their own unique role in the melody of ministry success.
Critical Events: The High Notes
Think of Critical Events as the powerful crescendos in your ministry symphony. These are the moments that gather people together for impact and catalytic change. For Kyle, one such moment came when he organized a strategy coordinator training in DFW. The room was filled with passionate individuals, each carrying a burden for different segments of their city. Some were focused on refugee communities, others on specific language groups, but all were united in their desire to see the gospel advance.
These events aren’t just meetings—they’re launching pads. Like the time when a simple lunch gathering turned into a divine appointment, with a football coach not only coming to Christ but immediately sharing his testimony with their Iraqi waitress. Such critical events serve as milestone markers in the journey, creating momentum and catalyzing action.
Ongoing Processes: The Steady Rhythm
If Critical Events are the crescendos, Ongoing Processes provide the steady drumbeat that keeps the ministry moving forward. This is where the real work of teaming happens—in the weekly rhythms of coaching conversations, regular check-ins, and consistent evaluation of progress.
Consider how one team in Oklahoma City developed a rhythm of prayer walking. They didn’t just do it once; they established a pattern: first circling the neighborhood’s perimeter, then walking its streets, then engaging with residents. This steady, intentional process led to the discovery of fourteen different language groups in just seventy-two homes—a finding that would have been impossible without consistent, ongoing engagement.
The beauty of these processes lies in their reliability. Team members know they can count on regular coaching sessions, consistent communication channels, and systematic ways to track and evaluate their work. It’s in these rhythms that trust is built, relationships are deepened, and real progress is made.
Key Projects: The Harmonies
Key Projects add depth and richness to the ministry symphony. These are the focused initiatives that move the strategy forward in tangible ways. Like the time when Bud’s team undertook a comprehensive mapping project of South Asian communities in their city. What started as a simple research project evolved into a strategic initiative that helped multiple churches understand where and how to engage with these communities.
Projects might include developing new training materials, creating contextual gospel presentations, or mapping unreached segments of your city. They’re time-bound, focused efforts that produce specific outcomes while building toward larger goals.
Bringing It All Together
The secret sauce comes together when these three components work in harmony. A research project (Key Project) might reveal the need for a training event (Critical Event), which then leads to establishing regular coaching relationships (Ongoing Process). Or a consistent prayer walk (Ongoing Process) might uncover a need that spawns a new community engagement initiative (Key Project), culminating in a celebration gathering (Critical Event).
This is exactly what happened in one community where regular prayer walks led to the discovery of a need for English classes. This sparked a project to establish an English club, which then became a regular ministry process, eventually celebrated at a community gathering that brought together partners from various circles of their teaming strategy.
Making It Work in Your Context
The key to implementing these components effectively is understanding that they’re not separate entities but interconnected parts of a greater whole. Just as a symphony requires different instruments playing different parts at different times, effective teaming requires knowing when to emphasize each component.
Sometimes you’ll need the big impact of a Critical Event to build momentum. Other times, you’ll need to focus on strengthening your Ongoing Processes to ensure sustainability. And there will be seasons when specific Key Projects demand your primary attention.
The goal isn’t perfect balance but strategic integration. Let your Critical Events support your Ongoing Processes. Allow your Processes to inform your Projects. Use your Projects to create opportunities for Events. When these components work together, they create a symphony of ministry impact that’s far greater than any single element could achieve alone.
Navigating Common Challenges in Teaming
The path to effective teaming is rarely smooth. Like any worthwhile endeavor, it comes with its share of challenges that must be navigated with wisdom, patience, and grace. Let’s explore some of the most common hurdles teams face and how successful strategy coordinators handle them.
Different Methodologies: Finding Unity Without Uniformity
When one SC first encountered resistance to his team’s gospel presentation tool in South Asia, he faced a common dilemma. Other workers in the area were using different methods, and tension was brewing. Rather than insisting on uniformity, he facilitated discovery of a profound truth: unity in mission doesn’t require identical methods.
The solution emerged through asking better questions:
- Is the gospel being clearly communicated?
- Are people coming to faith?
- Are new believers being discipled effectively?
- Is multiplication happening?
When these core outcomes were the focus, the specific methods became secondary. Teams learned to celebrate different approaches that produced fruit, even when they didn’t match their own preferred methods.
The Tools Tension
One strategy coordinator in Oklahoma City faced what many experience – the challenge of balancing tool consistency with practitioner preference. A team member wanted to use a different gospel presentation tool than what the network typically trained. Instead of making it a point of conflict, they established some helpful principles:
- Use what works abundantly
- Test it thoroughly
- Maintain honest dialogue about results
- Respect the broader training footprint
The key insight? Celebrate faithfulness and abundance over rigid conformity to specific tools.
Managing Conflict Constructively
Dave Miller shares how their network learned to handle disagreements over strategy and methodology. Rather than avoiding conflict or letting it fester, they developed a proactive approach:
1. Early Recognition
- Address issues when they’re small
- Have regular check-ins about team health
- Create safe spaces for expressing concerns
2. Focused Discussion
- Keep the mission central
- Focus on specific issues, not personalities
- Look for win-win solutions
3. Clear Resolution Processes
- Established pathways for handling disagreements
- Regular review and adjustment of expectations
- Commitment to maintaining relationships through conflict
The Specialization Struggle
One of the most subtle yet significant challenges teams face is the pull toward specialization. In Western contexts, particularly in the United States, people are trained to become experts in narrow fields. Yet effective teaming often requires becoming what Will Smith calls “generalist pioneers” who can handle multiple aspects of the mission task.
The transformation comes through:
- Embracing the learning process
- Valuing multiplication over expertise
- Focusing on reproducibility
- Maintaining a pioneer mindset
Resource Distribution and Stewardship
When multiple teams operate in the same city, questions of resource allocation inevitably arise. One network found success by:
1. Clear Communication
- Regular updates about resources and needs
- Transparent decision-making processes
- Shared understanding of priorities
2. Strategic Sharing
- Pooling resources for maximum impact
- Avoiding duplication of efforts
- Leveraging different strengths
3. Kingdom Mindset
- Focusing on collective impact
- Celebrating others’ successes
- Maintaining an abundance mentality
Cross-Cultural Complexities
In cities like Dallas-Fort Worth, with hundreds of language groups and cultural backgrounds, teams must navigate complex cross-cultural dynamics. Successful teams have learned to:
1. Build Cultural Intelligence
- Invest time in understanding different worldviews
- Learn from cultural insiders
- Adapt approaches appropriately
2. Develop Cultural Bridges
- Identify and train cultural liaisons
- Create spaces for cross-cultural learning
- Build trust across cultural boundaries
Moving Forward Through Challenges
The key to navigating these challenges successfully lies in maintaining:
1. Kingdom Perspective
- Focus on the larger mission
- See challenges as growth opportunities
- Maintain eternal perspective
2. Learning Posture
- Stay humble and teachable
- Learn from failures
- Share insights with others
3. Relational Priority
- Value relationships over methods
- Invest in trust-building
- Maintain unity in diversity
Remember, challenges in teaming aren’t obstacles to be avoided but opportunities for growth and refinement. When handled well, they often lead to stronger partnerships and more effective ministry impact.
Building Synergy in Your City
When the concentric circles of multiple teams begin to overlap across a city, something remarkable happens. It’s like watching a masterful orchestra where individual instruments, each playing their distinct parts, create a symphony far more beautiful than any could produce alone. This is the power of city-wide synergy in teaming.
The Power of Overlapping Circles
In Dallas-Fort Worth, this synergy became visible when multiple strategy coordinators began working among different Arab-speaking communities. One team focused on Jordanian Arabs in Richardson, while another engaged with Palestinian communities in a different area. Initially, these seemed like separate efforts, but the power of overlapping circles soon became apparent:
- Gospel workers trained in Arabic could serve across multiple communities
- Resources developed for one group could be adapted for others
- Prayer partners could intercede for multiple efforts
- Cultural insights gained in one context informed work in others
As Bud observed, “The same person can really be praying for 10 different people groups that’s connected to 10 different apostolic teams. The person sharing the gospel with Jordanian Arabs can also share the gospel with Palestinian Arabs, Iraqi Arabs.”
Creating Strategic Convergence
The synergy in a city grows through intentional convergence of efforts:
1. Shared Resources
- Training facilities and materials
- Language learning resources
- Cultural consultants
- Ministry tools and equipment
2. Collaborative Learning
- Cross-pollination of insights
- Shared best practices
- Joint problem-solving
- Collective wisdom accumulation
3. United Prayer Focus
- City-wide prayer initiatives
- Coordinated prayer walking
- Shared prayer requests
- Collective celebration of victories
Real-World Impact
Consider how this played out in Oklahoma City, where a systematic approach to prayer walking one neighborhood led to discovering 14 different language groups in just 72 homes. This discovery catalyzed multiple initiatives:
- English clubs serving multiple communities
- Soccer camps bringing together diverse groups
- Shared translation resources
- Multi-ethnic church planting efforts
The initial work of one team became a launch pad for multiple ministries, each building on the others’ momentum.
Mobilizing for Maximum Impact
Effective city-wide synergy requires strategic mobilization:
1. Strategic Placement
- Identifying gaps in engagement
- Positioning teams for maximum effectiveness
- Coordinating geographic coverage
- Aligning gifts with needs
2. Resource Multiplication
- Training reproducible leaders
- Developing shareable resources
- Creating multiplication pipelines
- Building sustainable systems
3. Kingdom Advancement
- Focusing on unreached segments
- Breaking new ground together
- Celebrating collective victories
- Building lasting momentum
The Catalyst of Shared Vision
One network discovered that vision-sharing became a catalyst for city-wide impact. They began regular gatherings where strategy coordinators could:
- Share stories of God’s work
- Present opportunities for collaboration
- Identify resource needs
- Celebrate victories together
These gatherings fostered a collective ownership of the city’s spiritual transformation.
Practical Steps for Building Synergy
1. Map Your City’s Ministry Landscape
- Identify existing teams and efforts
- Note areas of overlap and gaps
- Document resources and needs
- Track engagement levels
2. Create Connection Points
- Regular strategy coordinator meetups
- Shared training events
- Collaborative projects
- Joint celebration gatherings
3. Develop Shared Systems
- Common tracking methods
- Resource sharing platforms
- Communication channels
- Evaluation processes
Maintaining Healthy Synergy
To keep city-wide synergy strong:
1. Foster Open Communication
- Regular updates between teams
- Clear channels for sharing needs
- Transparent decision-making
- Collective problem-solving
2. Protect Team Distinctives
- Respect unique callings
- Honor different approaches
- Maintain healthy boundaries
- Celebrate diversity
3. Keep Mission Central
- Focus on kingdom advancement
- Prioritize unreached segments
- Measure collective impact
- Maintain eternal perspective
The beauty of city-wide synergy is that it creates something greater than the sum of its parts. When teams work together while maintaining their unique focus, the impact multiplies exponentially. As one strategy coordinator noted, “We’re not just building teams; we’re creating a movement that can transform our city for Christ.”
Practical Steps for Implementation
Moving from understanding teaming principles to actually implementing them can feel like crossing a wide canyon. Let’s break down this journey into manageable steps, learning from those who have successfully made this transition.
Starting Small: First Steps in Teaming
When Kyle began coordinating strategy in Dallas-Fort Worth, he didn’t start by trying to mobilize the entire city. Instead, he began with what he calls “the plastic fork stage” – using whatever simple tools were available to start digging.
Common Implementation Pitfalls to Avoid
- Starting Too Big
- Trying to do everything at once
- Taking on too many segments
- Recruiting too many partners too quickly
- Solution: Focus on depth before breadth
- Neglecting Foundations
- Skipping prayer and preparation
- Rushing past relationship building
- Missing cultural understanding
- Solution: Invest time in basics
- Poor Communication
- Unclear expectations
- Inconsistent updates
- Lack of feedback loops
- Solution: Establish clear communication patterns
Moving Forward with Confidence
Remember these key principles as you implement:
- Stay Learner-Oriented
- Maintain humility
- Ask questions
- Learn from others
- Adjust as needed
- Focus on People
- Build genuine relationships
- Value individuals over programs
- Invest in development
- Celebrate progress
- Trust the Process
- Don’t rush growth
- Allow for natural development
- Build sustainable patterns
- Maintain long-term perspective
Implementation isn’t about perfect execution but faithful progress. Start where you are, use what you have, and build step by step. As one strategy coordinator noted:
The key isn’t having everything figured out at the start – it’s being willing to begin and learn as you go.
Conclusion: The Future of Kingdom Impact Through Teaming
The complexity of reaching our cities demands something more dynamic than traditional team structures. As we’ve explored throughout this journey, teaming provides that flexible, mission-focused approach that can adapt to the challenges while maintaining effectiveness.
From the concentric circles model to the practical implementation steps, we’ve seen how teaming can transform individual efforts into collective impact. The stories from Dallas-Fort Worth, Oklahoma City, and other contexts demonstrate that when we answer the fundamental question “Who can we count on?” with wisdom and intentionality, remarkable things happen.
Remember that successful teaming isn’t about creating perfect organizational structures or having all the answers. Instead, it’s about:
- Building trust-based relationships that can weather challenges
- Maintaining flexibility while staying focused on the mission
- Creating spaces where others can grow and multiply
- Fostering city-wide synergy through strategic collaboration
As you step into your role in coordinating strategy, whether you’re starting with a “plastic fork” or building city-wide networks, remember that every great movement began with simple faithfulness. Your willingness to begin, to learn, to adapt, and to collaborate could be the catalyst that helps transform your city for Christ.
The future of kingdom impact lies not in isolated efforts but in the beautiful symphony of teams working together, each playing their part in God’s greater mission. The question isn’t whether we need teaming—it’s how quickly we can embrace it to see the nations reached and disciples multiplied.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Build relationships intentionally.
Trust God to multiply your efforts.
The harvest is waiting, and through effective teaming, we can see it reached together.
Be a movement multiplier.
Get starter tools and coaching to multiply disciples, leaders, and churches in your City.